QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Agriculture gets federal workforce training grants—with industry partners at the table

S. 2727 — A bill to amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 to authorize grants for eligible institutions to carry out agriculture workforce training programs, and for other purposes. · Filed by Tina Smith (D-MN) · Introduced Sep 4, 2025 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Workforce Development Grant Program

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill authorizes federal grants to agricultural colleges, community colleges, and career schools to develop workforce training programs in partnership with agriculture companies and nonprofits. The programs would include internships, apprenticeships, and technical skills training to help students enter the agriculture industry. At least 5% of grant funds must go toward recruitment and faculty professional development.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is straightforward: it authorizes federal grants to educational institutions for agriculture workforce training. The mapped stocks (consumer goods, tobacco, food companies) suggest regulatory exposure tracking, but the bill itself is a grant authorization with no regulatory content.

What the text implies

  • Grant recipients must partner with 'targeted industry partners' (agriculture companies, associations, nonprofits), creating potential for industry influence over curriculum and training priorities—students may be trained for employer-specific needs rather than broader career flexibility.
  • The bill does not specify funding levels, appropriation amounts, or competitive criteria for grant awards, leaving implementation details to USDA discretion and potentially creating uncertainty about actual program scale.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

agricultural companies and industry associations (as targeted industry partners); land-grant universities and agricultural colleges; community colleges and career/technical schools

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record