QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

USDA gets new security office to police agricultural data and foreign farmland deals

S. 2694 — Agriculture and National Security Act · Filed by Alex Padilla (D-CA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Sep 3, 2025 · Referred to committee

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
18/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Agricultural National Security Coordination

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a new Assistant Secretary position within the U.S. Department of Agriculture focused on national security threats to food and agriculture systems. The Assistant Secretary will coordinate with the National Security Council, intelligence agencies, and other federal departments to identify vulnerabilities in agricultural supply chains, foreign investment in farmland, cybersecurity risks, and emerging technologies like AI and biotechnology—and report biannually to Congress on gaps and policy recommendations.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is establishing an interagency coordination mechanism within USDA to identify and mitigate national security risks in food and agriculture systems. It is primarily structural and administrative, creating a new advisory position and reporting requirements rather than imposing direct regulatory changes.

What the text implies

  • The bill grants broad authority to assess 'national security vulnerabilities' in agriculture without defining what constitutes a vulnerability, potentially enabling regulatory or investigative actions based on vague criteria.
  • Language around 'foreign acquisition of intellectual property, agricultural assets, and land' and 'influence of foreign state-owned enterprises' could be used to justify restrictions on foreign investment or data access that may affect agricultural companies' international operations and competitiveness.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

defense and national security contractors (through expanded interagency coordination and potential n; large agricultural companies with resources to comply with new security assessments; agricultural data and cybersecurity firms

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record