NSF launches shared biotech labs, opens data to industry partners
S. 2676 — Cloud LAB Act of 2025 · Filed by Todd Young (R-IN) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Aug 1, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the National Science Foundation to establish a network of remote-controlled laboratory facilities (cloud labs) equipped with robots and advanced instruments that scientists can operate from a distance to conduct automated experiments and collect biological data. The NSF will coordinate existing cloud labs run by universities, companies, and government agencies, award grants to build at least 5 new cloud labs over time, and create an advisory board to oversee data access, security, and equitable use of the facilities by researchers across academia and industry.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a federal grant program to build and operate shared biotechnology research facilities. It is a straightforward infrastructure and research-capacity bill, not a regulatory change or market intervention.
What the text implies
- Data generated by NSF-funded cloud labs becomes a public resource available to authorized researchers, potentially including private companies; the bill requires a 'subscription model' for industry access, creating a revenue stream and data-sharing precedent that may influence how federally-funded research data is commercialized.
- The advisory board includes industry representatives and has 12-year tenure; industry input on 'data collection priorities' and 'authorized researcher' definitions may shape what research gets prioritized and who can access results, creating potential for private-sector influence over public research agenda.
- Intellectual property agreements are left to NSF discretion ('may include different agreements'); this flexibility could allow different terms for academic vs. commercial users, potentially favoring private entities with negotiating power.
- The bill sunsets after 12 years; long-term sustainability of the cloud lab network depends on future appropriations and reauthorization, creating uncertainty for researchers and institutions that build dependencies on the infrastructure.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill expands access to expensive research infrastructure and shared biological data for scientists across academia and industry, with explicit provisions for equitable access to underresourced institutions (HBCUs, minority-serving institutions, primarily undergraduate institutions). The public bears the cost of grants but gains from accelerated biotechnology research, open data sharing, and broader research capacity.
Who stands to gain
- biotechnology companies (subscription access to data and infrastructure)
- robotics and laboratory instrumentation manufacturers (equipment sales for cloud labs)
- academic institutions (grant funding for cloud lab development and operation)
- research organizations and universities (access to shared infrastructure)
Named in the bill
National Science Foundation (NSF), Department of Energy, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Executive Office of the President, biotechnology industry, academic institutions, historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs), minority-serving institutions
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Democrats.
- Aug 1, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Aug 1, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 1 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $50,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 17 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Todd Young, the sponsor, reported $736,495 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- American Society for Microbiology — $50,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 17, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (11,654 characters) on Nov 2, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,927 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 17, 2026 · page rendered 2026-11-02.
“NSF launches shared biotech labs, opens data to industry partners” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s2676 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.