President gets sweeping power to freeze assets, revoke visas over West Bank violence
S. 2667 — West Bank Violence Prevention Act of 2025 · Filed by Cory Booker (D-NJ) · 44 cosponsors · Introduced Aug 1, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill authorizes the President to impose sanctions—including asset freezes, visa revocations, and transaction bans—against foreign persons determined to be responsible for or complicit in violence, property destruction, or displacement of civilians in the West Bank. It covers individuals and entities involved in directing, planning, or enforcing policies that threaten West Bank stability, as well as those providing material support to sanctioned actors. The bill includes exceptions for humanitarian aid, intelligence activities, and UN-related obligations, and allows the President to waive sanctions on national security grounds.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to delegate broad presidential authority to impose economic and immigration sanctions on foreign persons involved in West Bank violence. It is a sanctions statute, not a peace initiative or violence-prevention program in the operational sense.
What the text implies
- The definition of 'complicit in' and 'indirectly engaged' is not constrained by statute, giving the President wide latitude to designate individuals or entities with tenuous connections to violence, potentially capturing journalists, aid workers, or political opponents.
- The bill does not require the President to provide designated persons with notice, evidence, or opportunity to contest designation before asset freezes take effect, creating potential due-process concerns for US persons and foreign nationals with US assets.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who it affects
The bill aims to deter violence and protect civilians in the West Bank—a legitimate public-safety goal—but grants the President broad, largely unreviewable discretion to designate foreign persons for sanctions based on vague criteria ('complicit in,' 'indirectly engaged'). This concentration of executive power with minimal congressional oversight or due process for the designated creates risk of overreach, while the humanitarian exceptions and intelligence carve-outs may limit practical harm.