Fintech firms get seat at table designing their own regulations
S. 2609 — Financial Technology Protection Act of 2025 · Filed by Ted Budd (R-NC) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 31, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a new Independent Financial Technology Working Group led by the Treasury Department to research how terrorists and criminals use digital assets (like cryptocurrencies) and emerging technologies to evade sanctions, launder money, and finance illegal activity. The group will include federal agencies, fintech companies, blockchain firms, financial institutions, and privacy advocates, and will produce annual reports and legislative recommendations over four years before automatically shutting down.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is establishing an interagency working group to research and develop policy on digital assets used in terrorism financing and sanctions evasion. It is a coordination and research mechanism, not a direct regulatory or enforcement action.
What the text implies
- Fintech and blockchain intelligence companies gain formal advisory role in shaping federal counter-terrorism and AML policy, potentially influencing regulatory proposals that affect their own compliance obligations and competitive landscape.
- The working group's legislative and regulatory proposals (subsection 2(b)(2)) are not binding but will carry significant weight with Congress and agencies; private-sector members may steer recommendations toward lighter compliance burdens or favorable definitions of 'illicit use'.
- The bill defines 'blockchain intelligence company' broadly (section 4(2)) to include transaction screening and sanctions screening services—companies providing these tools will be represented on the group designing the very regulations that create demand for their products.
- Public reporting requirement (section 3(a)(2)) mandates unclassified reports on digital-asset threats and mitigation strategy, but does not require disclosure of working-group member conflicts of interest or voting records, limiting transparency of private-sector influence.
- The four-year sunset (section 2(d)) is automatic but can be extended indefinitely through 'wind-up activities'—no explicit termination mechanism or performance review before renewal.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill creates a coordinated federal research and policy mechanism to combat terrorism financing and sanctions evasion using digital assets—a genuine public-safety interest. The inclusion of privacy advocates on the working group and the requirement for public reporting (in unclassified form) provide some transparency and civil-liberties check, though the bill does not restrict surveillance powers or create new privacy protections.
Who stands to gain
- Blockchain intelligence companies (transaction screening, sanctions screening, tracing tools)
- Fintech companies (advisory role in regulatory design)
- Financial institutions (potential compliance-cost reduction if working group recommends lighter AML
Named in the bill
Department of the Treasury, Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, Internal Revenue Service, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Homeland Security, United States Secret Service, Department of State, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Financial technology companies, Blockchain intelligence companies — and 3 more
Where it stands
2 cosponsors: 1 Democrats, 1 Republicans.
- Jul 31, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Jul 31, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $100,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 2 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Ted Budd, the sponsor, reported $300,250 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc. — $100,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (8,001 characters) on Jun 3, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Fintech firms get seat at table designing their own regulations” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s2609 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.