Labor bill quietly exempts small employers from OSHA safety enforcement
S. 2587 — Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026 · Filed by Shelley Capito (R-WV) · Introduced Jul 31, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This is a fiscal year 2026 appropriations bill funding the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education. It allocates approximately $3.98 billion for workforce training and employment programs (including apprenticeships, Job Corps, and services for dislocated workers), $395 million for senior employment, $79 billion for unemployment insurance administration, and substantial funding for OSHA, mine safety, and other labor programs. The bill also funds HHS and Education programs (text truncated, but standard appropriations structure). Beneficiaries include state workforce agencies, community colleges, apprenticeship programs, and federal agencies administering these programs.
Why we flagged it
This is a standard annual appropriations bill for three cabinet departments. Its core function is to allocate federal funds for employment training, unemployment benefits, worker safety, and education. The bill is mechanically straightforward but legislatively dense.
- Provisions exempting small farms and employers with below-average injury rates from OSHA enforcement are substantively unrelated to appropriations and function as deregulatory riders embedded in a funding bill.
What the text implies
- OSHA enforcement exemptions for small employers and farms may create a two-tier safety system where workers in smaller operations receive weaker protections, despite the bill's stated purpose of funding worker safety programs.
- The bill allows the Secretary of Labor broad transfer authority (up to 1% between programs, 0.5% to program administration), which could redirect funds away from direct worker services to administrative overhead without explicit congressional approval.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
state workforce agencies; community colleges; registered apprenticeship programs