Congress quietly dismantles labor protections for millions of workers
S. 2568 — Protecting American Jobs Act · Filed by Mike Lee (R-UT) · Introduced Jul 31, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill strips the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) of its rulemaking authority over labor disputes and shifts enforcement power from the NLRB to individual workers filing lawsuits in federal court. It prevents the NLRB from setting rules about unfair labor practices or union elections, and requires the agency to dismantle existing regulations within 6 months. Workers would have to hire lawyers and sue employers directly rather than rely on the NLRB's administrative process.
Why we flagged it
The bill's stated purpose is 'protecting American jobs,' but its mechanism systematically dismantles the NLRB's ability to enforce labor law. It transfers enforcement from a specialized agency to individual litigation, which is functionally a deregulation of labor protections.
What the text implies
- Workers lose access to the NLRB's expedited unfair-labor-practice process, which historically resolved disputes in months rather than years. Federal court litigation typically takes 2–5 years, during which workers may face retaliation.
- The bill's ban on NLRB rulemaking about 'representation elections' may prevent the agency from updating election procedures to address modern organizing tactics (e.g., remote work, gig economy), freezing labor law in its current form.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
large employers; anti-union consulting firms; management-side labor law firms