Congress targets $300K tax breaks for waterfront businesses facing climate risks
S. 2538 — Working Waterfront Disaster Mitigation Tax Credit Act · Filed by Angus King (I-ME) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jul 30, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a new federal tax credit worth up to 30% of the cost of disaster-mitigation infrastructure on working waterfronts—docks, fishing facilities, boatbuilding sites, and similar water-dependent businesses. The credit caps at $300,000 per taxpayer per decade and applies only to businesses with average annual gross receipts under $47 million. Eligible projects must meet current building codes and use methods like structural elevation, flood barriers, shoreline stabilization, or early-warning systems to protect against natural hazards.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a narrowly defined investment tax credit (30% of qualified costs, capped at $300,000 per taxpayer per decade) for disaster-mitigation infrastructure on working waterfront property. It is not a broad public-safety measure or environmental protection—it is a tax expenditure benefiting a specific industry segment.
What the text implies
- The $47 million gross-receipts threshold is indexed to inflation after 2026, potentially expanding eligibility over time and increasing long-term federal revenue loss.
- The credit applies to property 'placed in service' after December 31, 2025, but the bill does not specify whether retroactive claims or carryback provisions apply, creating potential ambiguity in implementation.
- The bill requires Secretary of Treasury coordination with FEMA on regulations, but does not mandate public notice-and-comment rulemaking, potentially allowing opaque guidance on what qualifies as a 'qualifying project.'
- Possessions of the United States (Puerto Rico, USVI, Guam, etc.) receive separate Treasury payments to offset revenue loss or distribute equivalent benefits, creating a parallel subsidy stream not subject to the same per-taxpayer caps.
- The credit is available to any taxpayer meeting the gross-receipts test, including large corporations with multiple waterfront subsidiaries, as long as each subsidiary is treated as a separate 'trade or business' under IRC §52/§414 aggregation rules.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill provides genuine tax relief to a specific class of small-to-medium waterfront businesses facing real climate and natural-hazard risks, supporting economically important maritime industries and potentially incentivizing resilience investments that reduce future disaster costs. However, the benefit is narrowly targeted to business owners in waterfront sectors (fishing, boatbuilding, aquaculture, dredging), not the general public, and the cost is borne by all taxpayers through foregone fed
Who stands to gain
- commercial fishing operations
- recreational boating and fishing businesses
- boatbuilding and marine construction firms
- aquaculture operations
- dredging companies
- waterfront property owners in maritime industries
Named in the bill
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, Section 48F (new), Section 46 (investment credit), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Secretary of the Treasury, International Code Council, U.S. possessions (Puerto Rico, USVI, Guam, American Samoa, Northern Mariana Islands)
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Republicans.
- Jul 30, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Jul 30, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Finance · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $3,540,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 135 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Angus King, the sponsor, reported $32,500 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- American Property Casualty Insurance Association — $3,540,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 22, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (10,684 characters) on May 21, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 22, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress targets $300K tax breaks for waterfront businesses facing climate risks” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s2538 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.