Fed earnings rule quietly deleted—but what was it protecting?
S. 2499 — FAIR Act · Filed by Rick Scott (R-FL) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jul 29, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill removes a provision from the Federal Reserve Act that governs how the Federal Reserve handles earnings on reserve balances held by banks. The specific provision being struck (Section 19(b)(12)) is not quoted in the bill itself, so its exact content and current effect cannot be determined from this text alone. The change takes effect 180 days after enactment.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole operative function is to remove a specific subsection governing how the Federal Reserve treats earnings on reserve balances. Without the text of that subsection, the policy intent cannot be fully characterized, but the mechanism is a targeted statutory deletion affecting Fed-bank financial relationships.
What the text implies
- The bill's title ('Fiscal Accountability for Interest on Reserves Act') suggests a transparency or accountability purpose, but the operative text simply deletes a provision without explaining what it does or why deletion serves accountability.
- Section 19(b)(12) may currently require the Fed to pay interest on reserve balances at a specific rate, cap such payments, or mandate disclosure — striking it without replacement could shift discretion to the Fed or eliminate a constraint on bank earnings.
- A 180-day delayed effective date suggests awareness of market sensitivity; the lag may allow banks and the Fed to prepare for changed earnings treatment.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The civic effect cannot be determined without knowing what Section 19(b)(12) currently provides. If it caps or restricts Fed payments to banks, striking it may increase bank profits at public expense; if it mandates transparency or limits Fed discretion, striking it may reduce accountability. The bill's brevity and reliance on external statutory reference prevents a definitive verdict.
Who stands to gain
- commercial banks (primary holders of Federal Reserve reserve balances)
- large financial institutions
Named in the bill
Federal Reserve, Federal Reserve Act, Section 19(b)(12), commercial banks
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Republicans.
- Jul 29, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Jul 29, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (372 characters) on Aug 11, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Fed earnings rule quietly deleted—but what was it protecting?” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s2499 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.