Pentagon locks in 50-year nuclear contracts with minimal oversight
S. 2389 — ARMOR Act of 2025 · Filed by Andy Kim (D-NJ) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jul 23, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the Army to run a pilot program deploying advanced nuclear reactors (small modular or micro-reactors) at military installations to power critical infrastructure, with a goal of completion by 2030. It authorizes the military to sign 50-year contracts for nuclear energy, allows excess power to be sold to the commercial grid, and adds nuclear technology to the Defense Department's strategic investment portfolio.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to authorize and fund a military pilot program for advanced nuclear reactors at Army installations, coupled with long-term contracting authority and strategic investment classification. It is primarily a defense-infrastructure and energy-resilience measure, not a deregulation or corporate giveaway on its face.
What the text implies
- The 50-year contract authority (section 3) is unusually long-term for military procurement and may lock the military into a single contractor's technology and pricing for half a century, limiting future competition or technological switching.
- Section 2(c)(3) permits co-location with AI data centers, potentially expanding the pilot's scope beyond energy resilience into dual-use military computing infrastructure without explicit congressional authorization for that expansion.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
advanced nuclear reactor manufacturers (e.g., NuScale, X-energy, Oklo); nuclear energy contractors and operators; defense contractors with nuclear technology divisions