QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal grants help mid-career workers rejoin STEM workforce

S. 2306 — STEM RESTART Act · Filed by Jacky Rosen (D-NV) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 16, 2025 · Referred to committee

82%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Workforce Training Subsidy

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a new federal grant program under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to fund small and medium-sized STEM companies (50–10,000 employees) to hire mid-career workers returning to the STEM field through paid internships or "returnships" that lead to full-time positions above entry level. The Department of Labor will award competitive grants of $100,000–$1 million annually for small firms and $500,000–$5 million for medium firms or consortia, over 3–5 year periods, with $50 million authorized annually through 2030. Eligible workers include unemployed, underemployed, and displaced mid-career professionals, with priority given to rural workers.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a federal grant program that subsidizes small and medium-sized STEM businesses to hire and train mid-career workers. While framed as a worker re-entry initiative, the funds flow to employers, not directly to workers, making it a targeted business subsidy within a workforce development framework.

What the text implies

  • The bill does not require grant recipients to hire workers at the end of the returnship period, only to provide the training and temporary employment. Conversion to permanent employment is measured but not mandated, creating a risk that workers complete training but are not retained.
  • Grant funds may be used to supplement (but not supplant) compensation for existing employees who mentor returnship participants. This allows businesses to use up to 20% of grant funds to pay existing staff, potentially reducing the net new training investment.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

small and medium-sized STEM businesses (50–10,000 employees); eligible training providers (institutions of higher education, for-profit and nonprofit service prov

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record