Federal heat-safety standard mandated for workers in hot industries
S. 2298 — Asunción Valdivia Heat Illness, Injury, and Fatality Prevention Act of 2025 · Filed by Alex Padilla (D-CA) · 27 cosponsors · Introduced Jul 16, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill directs the Secretary of Labor to create a federal occupational safety standard protecting workers from heat-related illness and injury within one year. The standard will require employers to implement engineering controls, administrative controls (like rest breaks and work scheduling), personal protective equipment, medical monitoring, training, and heat-illness prevention plans—with workers paid during required rest breaks and training. The bill is named after Asunción Valdivia, a worker who died from heat exposure.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a direct mandate to the Secretary of Labor to promulgate an occupational safety standard for heat protection. This is regulatory rulemaking authority, not a tax provision, subsidy, or commemorative act—the naming after Asunción Valdivia is protective (honoring a worker harmed by the condition being addressed), not vanity.
What the text implies
- The bill bypasses normal Administrative Procedure Act notice-and-comment timelines for the interim final rule (1 year, without regard to APA chapters 5–6), allowing faster worker protection but reducing employer input opportunity during initial rulemaking.
- Judicial review is confined to the D.C. Circuit and cannot delay rule effectiveness, limiting employer legal challenges and accelerating enforcement.
- The bill requires the Secretary to presume feasibility of any state-approved heat standard in effect for 1+ year, potentially locking in more stringent state standards as federal baseline.
- Recordkeeping violations under this Act are enforced as distinct violations separate from simultaneous OSHA violations, potentially doubling penalty exposure for a single workplace incident.
- The 4-year statute of limitations for citations is longer than typical OSHA violations (6 months), extending the enforcement window and increasing employer liability risk.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Workers gain enforceable protections against heat-related illness and injury, paid rest breaks, access to water and shade, medical monitoring, and training—with whistleblower protections against retaliation. Employers face compliance costs but the standard is designed to be feasible and based on best available evidence, including state standards already in effect.
Who stands to gain
- occupational safety and health consultants
- engineering firms specializing in climate control and ventilation
- personal protective equipment manufacturers
- medical monitoring and occupational health service providers
Named in the bill
Secretary of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Office of Management and Budget, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, House Committee on Education and Workforce, Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Where it stands
27 cosponsors: 26 Democrats, 1 Independents.
- Jul 16, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Jul 16, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $846,377 in lobbying spend. A filing names 80 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Alex Padilla, the sponsor, reported $176,500 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees — $630,000 on 1 filing
- Associated General Contractors of America — $216,377 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (16,621 characters) on Aug 21, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Federal heat-safety standard mandated for workers in hot industries” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s2298 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.