Military boots must be made in America—but who pays the bill?
S. 2199 — A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to issue regulations requiring that optional combat boots worn by members of the Armed Forces wear be made in the United States, and for other purposes. · Filed by Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 26, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Secretary of Defense to issue regulations within two years mandating that any optional combat boots (those not issued by the military) worn by service members must be entirely manufactured in the United States, including all materials and components. The bill includes narrow exemptions for boots designed for specific military needs and for medical reasons.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to restrict military personnel's footwear choices to domestically manufactured products, functioning as a protectionist measure for U.S. boot manufacturers. This is a regulatory mandate tied to procurement/supply-chain policy, not a commemorative or appropriations measure.
What the text implies
- Service members purchasing optional boots out-of-pocket may face significantly higher costs if U.S. manufacturers charge premium prices or have limited specialty options, effectively shifting costs from the military budget to individual personnel.
- The 'specific use and specific need' exemption mirrors existing Buy American waiver language but may create administrative burden and inconsistent enforcement across service branches.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
U.S. combat boot manufacturers; domestic footwear supply chain vendors; materials producers (leather, synthetic, rubber)