Military boots must be made in America—service members lose choice
S. 2199 — A bill to require the Secretary of Defense to issue regulations requiring that optional combat boots worn by members of the Armed Forces wear be made in the United States, and for other purposes. · Filed by Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 26, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Secretary of Defense to issue regulations within two years mandating that any optional combat boots (those not issued by the military) worn by service members as part of their uniform must be entirely manufactured in the United States from U.S.-sourced materials and components. The bill includes narrow exemptions for boots designed for specific military needs and for medical reasons.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a regulatory mandate requiring domestic sourcing for a specific product category (optional military boots). It is a protectionist measure favoring U.S. manufacturers over foreign competitors, framed as a military readiness and domestic production requirement.
What the text implies
- Service members may face higher costs if U.S.-made boots are more expensive than foreign alternatives, with no compensation mechanism.
- The exemption for 'specific use and specific need' (referencing 10 U.S.C. § 4862) is undefined in this bill and may create unpredictable enforcement.
- Medical exemption is narrow and may not cover all legitimate physiological needs, forcing service members to seek waivers.
- The two-year implementation window may create supply-chain disruption if U.S. manufacturers cannot meet demand at scale.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Service members face a restriction on their choice of optional footwear, potentially limiting access to boots they prefer or can afford; however, the bill supports domestic manufacturing and may protect U.S. jobs in the boot industry. The net effect on ordinary citizens (non-military) is minimal, but military personnel bear a concrete cost in choice and potentially price.
Who stands to gain
- U.S. combat boot manufacturers
- U.S. materials suppliers and component manufacturers
Named in the bill
Secretary of Defense, Armed Forces, U.S. Department of Defense, 10 U.S.C. § 4862, U.S. combat boot manufacturers
Where it stands
2 cosponsors: 1 Independents, 1 Republicans.
- Jun 26, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Jun 26, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Armed Services · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Dec 2025 to Dec 2025. Those filings disclosed $653,644 in lobbying spend. A filing names 8 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
Tammy Duckworth, the sponsor, reported $148,182 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- American Apparel & Footwear Association — $343,644 on 1 filing
- Footwear Distributors & Retailers of America — $310,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jan 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (3,076 characters) on Jun 3, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Dec 2025. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jan 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Military boots must be made in America—service members lose choice” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s2199 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.