Federal agencies get broad power to open public lands to grazing during disasters
S. 211 — Resiliency for Ranching and Natural Conservation Health Act · Filed by John Barrasso (R-WY) · 6 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 23, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends federal land management law to allow ranchers holding grazing permits on public lands to temporarily use vacant grazing allotments when their primary pastures become unusable due to natural disasters (drought, wildfire, wildfire, infestation). The Secretary of Agriculture and Interior would have discretion to approve such temporary use, set terms based on local conditions, and allow temporary infrastructure like portable fencing and water troughs. The temporary use does not affect the rancher's original permit or future management decisions about the vacant allotment.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a temporary-use provision allowing ranchers to access vacant public grazing allotments during natural disasters. While framed as disaster relief, it functions as a discretionary expansion of grazing access on public lands.
What the text implies
- The bill grants broad agency discretion to determine what constitutes 'temporary unusable' and 'appropriate for temporary grazing use' without defining these terms, creating potential for inconsistent or politically influenced decisions.
- Temporary use of vacant allotments may establish de facto grazing rights or precedent, making future permanent allocation more likely even though the statute says temporary use does not alter future management decisions.
- The provision allowing 'temporary rangeland improvements' (portable corrals, fencing, pipelines) may create infrastructure that persists beyond the disaster period, effectively converting temporary use into semi-permanent occupation.
- No explicit requirement for environmental review (NEPA compliance) is stated in the excerpt, potentially allowing grazing on sensitive lands without standard ecological assessment.
- The bill coordinates between USDA (National Forests) and Interior (BLM) but does not require coordination with state wildlife agencies or conservation groups, despite mentioning 'prior agency agreement' language.
Who it affects
The bill provides a practical disaster-relief mechanism for ranchers facing genuine hardship from natural events, which has public benefit in maintaining rural livelihoods and food production. However, it grants broad discretionary authority to federal agencies to open vacant public lands to grazing with minimal procedural safeguards, potentially bypassing environmental review and competing public interests (wildlife habitat, conservation, recreation) without explicit statutory protection.
Who stands to gain
- livestock ranchers and grazing permit holders
- agricultural operations dependent on seasonal grazing
Named in the bill
U.S. Senate, Senator John Barrasso (R-WY), Senator Jim Risch (R-ID), Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD), Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), Senator Tim Sheehy (R-MT), Secretary of Agriculture, Secretary of Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Forest Service, Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976
Where it stands
6 cosponsors: 6 Republicans.
- Jan 23, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Jan 23, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (text: CR S336-337)”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
2 lobbying clients named this bill on 3 disclosure filings across 3 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $95,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 27 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 41% of bills with at least one filing.
John Barrasso, the sponsor, reported $408,500 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Up for Growth Action Inc — $90,000 on 2 filings
- Public Lands Council — $5,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 16, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI scored this bill from its title only — the full text has not been read; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 16, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Federal agencies get broad power to open public lands to grazing during disasters” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s211 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.