QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Commerce gets sweeping power to block vehicle tech deals—with minimal public oversight

S. 2040 — Connected Vehicle National Security Review Act · Filed by Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Jun 11, 2025 · Referred to committee

45%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
35/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernNational Security Regulatory Authority

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a new federal office within the Commerce Department to review and block sales or transfers of advanced vehicle technology (connected cars with wireless communications) that involve companies or countries deemed national security threats—specifically China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. The Secretary of Commerce gains broad power to investigate transactions, impose conditions, or prohibit deals entirely if they pose 'undue risk' to critical infrastructure or national security.

Why we flagged it

The bill establishes a new executive office with broad investigative and prohibitory powers over connected vehicle transactions involving foreign entities or jurisdictions of concern. It is fundamentally a regulatory and enforcement mechanism, not a subsidy, tax provision, or commemorative act.

What the text implies

  • The bill grants the Secretary of Commerce authority to impose conditions or prohibitions on vehicle sales with minimal judicial review—challenges must be filed in the D.C. Circuit within 180 days, and sensitive security information is reviewed ex parte and in camera, meaning the defendant/company may never see the government's full case.
  • The definition of 'covered transaction' is extremely broad: it includes not just foreign-owned vehicle manufacturers, but any transaction involving ICTS (information and communications technology services) 'designed, developed, manufactured, or supplied by persons owned by, controlled by, or subject to a jurisdiction of concern.' This could capture domestic suppliers using foreign components or fo
  • The bill exempts the Commerce Department from the Paperwork Reduction Act, meaning the Secretary can impose unlimited reporting and documentation requirements on companies without standard OMB review or public comment periods.
  • Civil penalties are severe: up to $1 million per violation or twice the transaction value, whichever is greater, plus potential revocation of authorizations and blanket prohibitions on future transactions. Criminal penalties reach 20 years imprisonment, creating extreme enforcement leverage.
  • The Director of National Intelligence must submit annual risk assessments identifying 'specific participants in the supply chain' posing risk, but these can be classified and withheld from Congress and the public, creating a secret blacklist mechanism.

Who it affects

Citizens may benefit from national security oversight of foreign-controlled vehicle technology that could be weaponized or remotely sabotaged. However, the bill grants the Commerce Secretary sweeping, largely unreviewable authority to block or condition transactions with minimal transparency, potentially raising prices for connected vehicles, limiting consumer choice, and creating regulatory uncertainty without clear public accountability or judicial oversight.

Who stands to gain

  • domestic automotive manufacturers (reduced foreign competition)
  • domestic semiconductor and ICTS suppliers (protected market share)
  • defense contractors (aligned with national security framing)

Named in the bill

Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security, Office of Information and Communications Technology and Services, Director of National Intelligence, Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, Committee on Foreign Affairs, Export Administration Regulations, Commerce Control List, Entity List, Executive Order 13873, Executive Order 14034, Defense Production Act of 1950 — and 5 more

Where it stands

1 cosponsor: 1 Republicans.

  • Jun 11, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
  • Jun 11, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jun 8, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Commerce gets sweeping power to block vehicle tech deals—with minimal public oversight” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s2040 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.