QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Pentagon gets veto over land sales and energy projects near military bases

S. 197 — Protecting Military Installations and Ranges Act of 2025 · Filed by Ted Cruz (R-TX) · 8 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 22, 2025 · Referred to committee

55%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
25/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
1
Unrelated riders
No connection to the stated subject
National Security Land Safeguard

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill expands the federal government's power to block or scrutinize foreign real estate purchases and leases near U.S. military installations and airspace. It requires the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS) to automatically review any purchase or lease of land within 100 miles of a military base, or 50 miles of military training routes and airspace, if the buyer is from Russia, China, Iran, or North Korea. It also ties energy project approvals to the outcome of these foreign investment reviews, giving the Defense Department veto power over renewable and other energy projects on affected land.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to prevent foreign adversaries from acquiring real estate near military installations and airspace. While it amends the Defense Production Act and involves energy project review, its primary mechanism is a geographic and foreign-ownership screening tool for national security purposes.

  • Sections 3 ties energy project approvals (under FAA/DOT authority) to CFIUS foreign investment reviews, creating a veto mechanism unrelated to the stated land-purchase safeguard.

What the text implies

  • Energy projects (solar, wind, transmission) on private land within 50–100 miles of military zones may face indefinite delays if any foreign entity is involved in the land transaction, even indirectly or historically.
  • The mandatory CFIUS review triggers automatically for any covered transaction, potentially creating a backlog and slowing legitimate domestic real estate and development activity in broad geographic zones.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

defense contractors; domestic real estate developers (reduced foreign competition); energy companies with existing permits (reduced new competition)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record