QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

New federal felony for naming law enforcement officers—with vague obstruction standard.

S. 1952 — Protecting Law Enforcement from Doxxing Act · Filed by Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Jun 4, 2025 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Criminal Law Amendment

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a new federal crime: publicly releasing the name of a federal law enforcement officer with the intent to obstruct a criminal investigation or immigration enforcement operation. Violators face up to 5 years in prison and/or fines. The bill amends existing obstruction-of-justice law (18 U.S.C. § 1510) to add this specific prohibition and updates cross-references in related statutes.

Why we flagged it

The bill adds a new federal felony to existing obstruction-of-justice statutes. It is a straightforward criminal-code amendment, not a regulatory carve-out, appropriation, or commemorative measure.

What the text implies

  • The bill does not define 'intent to obstruct' with precision; prosecutors may interpret this broadly to cover speech about officer identity even when the speaker's primary purpose is transparency or accountability rather than investigation obstruction.
  • The statute applies to 'any' federal law enforcement officer (FBI, DEA, ICE, Secret Service, etc.), creating a blanket prohibition that may capture speech about officers in high-profile or controversial investigations where public identification is newsworthy.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who it affects

The bill protects law enforcement safety and investigation integrity by criminalizing doxxing intended to obstruct justice—a legitimate public interest. However, it creates a speech restriction that could chill legitimate public discourse about officer identity, accountability, and misconduct, especially when the line between 'obstruction' and protected speech about government conduct remains legally contested.

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record