Congress moves to strip legal shield protecting police from civil rights suits
S. 1913 — Ending Qualified Immunity Act · Filed by Ed Markey (D-MA) · 2 cosponsors · Introduced May 22, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill removes qualified immunity—a legal doctrine that shields government officials from lawsuits for civil rights violations unless the violated right was 'clearly established' at the time. The bill amends Section 1983 of the Revised Statutes (the post-Civil War law allowing citizens to sue officials who violate their constitutional rights) to eliminate the good-faith and clearly-established-right defenses, making it easier for citizens to hold state and local officials accountable in court for rights violations.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole operative mechanism is removing a judicial doctrine that shields government officials from liability. It is a straightforward civil-rights enforcement bill, not a tax measure, appropriation, or regulatory carve-out. The title and text align perfectly.
What the text implies
- Removal of qualified immunity may increase litigation costs for state and local governments, potentially shifting budgets away from services to legal defense and settlements.
- The bill applies retroactively to pending cases, which may reopen settled or dismissed cases and create a wave of litigation.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
civil rights attorneys and plaintiff's bar; litigation funding firms