QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress funds comprehensive sex ed, repeals abstinence-only program

S. 1910 — Real Education and Access for Healthy Youth Act of 2025 · Filed by Cory Booker (D-NJ) · 6 cosponsors · Introduced May 22, 2025 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
5/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Public Health Education Expansion

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill authorizes $100 million annually (2026–2031) in federal grants to schools, colleges, youth organizations, and health providers to teach comprehensive sex education and deliver sexual health services to young people ages 10–29. The education must be medically accurate, evidence-based, age-appropriate, and culturally responsive—covering anatomy, contraception, STI prevention, consent, healthy relationships, gender identity, and interpersonal violence. It prioritizes funding for underserved communities (low-income, LGBTQ+, youth of color, foster/justice-involved youth) and repeals the federal abstinence-only education program, redirecting that funding to this new initiative.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a straightforward federal grant program to fund comprehensive sex education and sexual health services. It is not a tax provision, subsidy to private industry, or regulatory carve-out—it is direct public investment in youth health education infrastructure.

What the text implies

  • Repeal of Section 510 (abstinence-only funding) redirects approximately $75–100M annually in existing federal education funds; states and districts that have relied on abstinence-only grants will need to transition curricula and may face local political resistance.
  • The bill's emphasis on 'reproductive justice' framing and explicit inclusion of gender identity, sexual orientation, and historical trauma may trigger state-level legislative backlash or parental opt-out demands in conservative jurisdictions, fragmenting implementation.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

public school districts and state education agencies; institutions of higher education (especially minority-serving institutions); nonprofit youth-serving organizations

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record