Military workers get healthcare choice, not forced into civilian plan
S. 1861 — Servicemember Healthcare Freedom Act of 2025 · Filed by Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) · Introduced May 22, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill allows members of the Selected Reserve and National Guard who work for the federal government as civilians to enroll in TRICARE Reserve Select (military healthcare) instead of being forced into the Federal Employee Health Benefits (FEHB) civilian plan. Currently, federal employment disqualifies them from TRICARE; the bill removes that barrier effective January 1, 2026, giving these dual-status service members a choice between military and civilian healthcare coverage.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a straightforward removal of an enrollment barrier for a specific class of federal employees (dual-status service members), allowing them to elect military healthcare coverage. It is a targeted benefit expansion, not a broad policy reform.
What the text implies
- Dual-status service members may face administrative complexity managing two employer-sponsored plans simultaneously, though the bill frames this as a choice benefit.
- TRICARE Reserve Select is typically lower-cost than FEHB; this change may shift some federal employees away from the FEHB risk pool, potentially affecting FEHB premium dynamics for remaining enrollees.
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
TRICARE (military healthcare system); Dual-status service members (as beneficiaries of expanded choice)