Espionage law now covers video—no carve-out for journalists or whistleblowers.
S. 1809 — Drone Espionage Act · Filed by Ashley Moody (R-FL) · 13 cosponsors · Introduced May 20, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the federal espionage statute (18 U.S.C. § 793) to explicitly include video as a form of prohibited transmission of defense information, alongside existing prohibitions on photographs and other materials. It closes a potential gap where someone might argue that video—as distinct from still photography—falls outside the current law's scope.
Why we flagged it
The bill is a narrow, technical amendment to the Espionage Act designed to ensure video recordings are treated the same as photographs under federal law. It is not a new policy but a clarification of existing criminal liability.
What the text implies
- The amendment does not define 'video' or distinguish between classified, unclassified, or publicly available defense information, potentially creating ambiguity in prosecution.
- Existing § 793 case law (including prosecutions of journalists and whistleblowers) will now apply to video; the amendment inherits all prior interpretive doctrines without explicit limitation.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
The bill strengthens enforcement against unauthorized disclosure of classified defense information, which protects national security and public safety. However, it also expands criminal liability in a statute already used to prosecute journalists, whistleblowers, and researchers; the amendment does not distinguish between malicious espionage and good-faith disclosure of government wrongdoing, creating a chilling effect on lawful speech and accountability.