Congress expands foreign-investment scrutiny to U.S. agriculture and food supply
S. 179 — FARM Act · Filed by Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) · 14 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 22, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Defense Production Act to give the Secretary of Agriculture a seat at the table in foreign-investment reviews (CFIUS) and expands the law's scope to cover agricultural transactions, supply chains, and technologies. It requires the Agriculture Department and Government Accountability Office to report within one year on foreign investment threats to U.S. farming and food systems. The effect is to subject agricultural deals involving foreign entities to national-security scrutiny and to treat agricultural supply chains as critical infrastructure.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is to expand CFIUS jurisdiction and national-security review authority to cover agricultural transactions and supply chains. It is a regulatory/oversight measure, not a subsidy, tax carve-out, or deregulation — it increases federal scrutiny of foreign agricultural investment.
What the text implies
- The definition of 'agricultural products' is cross-referenced to a 1926 statute (7 U.S.C. 451), which may be narrower or broader than contemporary agricultural sectors (e.g., biotech, vertical farming, lab-grown meat); scope ambiguity could lead to inconsistent CFIUS application.
- Adding the Secretary of Agriculture to CFIUS may slow deal review timelines and increase uncertainty for U.S. agricultural companies seeking foreign investment or partnerships, potentially disadvantaging them relative to non-agricultural sectors.
- The bill requires reports on 'agriculture-related espionage and theft techniques' but does not define what constitutes a reportable threat; this may lead to over-reporting or politicization of foreign investment concerns.
- Agricultural supply chains are now classified as 'critical infrastructure' under the Defense Production Act, which may trigger additional regulatory obligations and emergency-powers authority beyond CFIUS review alone.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill strengthens oversight of foreign control of U.S. agriculture, which protects domestic food security and supply-chain resilience — a genuine public benefit. However, it also expands federal authority to scrutinize and potentially block agricultural transactions, which may increase compliance costs, slow investment, and reduce market access for U.S. agricultural businesses seeking foreign capital or partnerships. The net effect depends on how aggressively CFIUS applies the new authority.
Who stands to gain
- U.S. agricultural companies (protected from foreign takeover/control)
- Agricultural technology and IP holders (protected from foreign espionage/theft)
Named in the bill
Secretary of Agriculture, Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), Comptroller General of the United States, Defense Production Act of 1950, Act of July 2, 1926 (agricultural products definition)
Where it stands
14 cosponsors: 13 Republicans, 1 Democrats.
- Jan 22, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Jan 22, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 1 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Dec 2025 to Dec 2025. Those filings disclosed $40,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 7 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Tommy Tuberville, the sponsor, reported $-1,614 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Alabama Farmers Federation — $40,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jan 19, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (3,181 characters) on Jun 3, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Dec 2025. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jan 19, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress expands foreign-investment scrutiny to U.S. agriculture and food supply” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s179 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.