QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Colorado River protection bill locks in water rights, forecloses future federal streamflow safeguard

S. 1787 — Dolores River National Conservation Area and Special Management Area Act · Filed by Michael Bennet (D-CO) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced May 15, 2025 · Reported out

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Conservation and Water Rights Protection

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill establishes two protected areas in Colorado along the Dolores River: a 41,000-acre National Conservation Area managed by the Interior Department and a 15,452-acre Special Management Area within the San Juan National Forest managed by the Forest Service. The bill protects the river's native fish, recreation, and scenic values while explicitly preserving all existing water rights, the Dolores Project dam operations, grazing permits, and private property access—no new water rights are created or reserved by the federal government.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is to designate protected lands for conservation while simultaneously guaranteeing that no federal water rights are created and all existing state-decreed water rights remain untouched. This dual protection—conservation plus water-rights certainty—is the bill's true character.

What the text implies

  • The bill releases portions of the Dolores River from potential Wild and Scenic Rivers designation, foreclosing future federal streamflow protections that might otherwise apply to the river.
  • The Ponderosa Gorge management provisions allow the Lone Pine Vegetation Management Project (authorized in 2020) to proceed, potentially permitting timber harvest in an otherwise protected area.
  • The bill permits new utility right-of-way corridors up to 150 feet wide for transmission lines, creating an exception to otherwise strict development prohibitions.
  • Annual reporting on native fish conservation is required but carries no enforcement mechanism or mandatory action if targets are not met.
  • The Native Fish Monitoring and Recommendation Team is consulted but has no veto power over water management decisions; the Bureau of Reclamation retains final authority.

Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.

Who it affects

Citizens gain permanent protection of a major river ecosystem and recreation area without losing existing water rights or private property rights. The bill explicitly shields the Dolores Project (a major water supply) and all pre-existing water allocations from federal interference, and requires consultation with local stakeholders and tribes in management decisions.

Who stands to gain

  • Dolores Water Conservancy District (guaranteed continued operation and water allocation)
  • Agricultural water users (grazing permits and water rights explicitly protected)
  • Recreation and tourism operators (whitewater boating, hunting, fishing access preserved)

Named in the bill

U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Reclamation, Dolores Water Conservancy District, Ute Mountain Ute Tribe, Colorado Parks and Wildlife, San Juan National Forest, McPhee Reservoir, Dolores Project, Colorado Ute Indian Water Rights Settlement Act of 1988

Where it stands

1 cosponsor: 1 Democrats.

  • May 15, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
  • May 15, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources”
  • Dec 17, 2025 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

Money around this bill

5 lobbying clients named this bill on 8 disclosure filings across 3 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $212,509 in lobbying spend. A filing names 18 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.

More lobbying clients named this bill than 78% of bills with at least one filing.

Michael Bennet, the sponsor, reported $21,000 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.

  • Trout Unlimited — $120,000 on 1 filing
  • Trails Preservation Alliance — $52,500 on 2 filings
  • Backcountry Hunters & Anglers — $26,409 on 2 filings
  • The Conservation Alliance — $13,600 on 2 filings
  • Anfield Energy, Inc. — $0 on 1 filing

Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (23,850 characters) on Aug 20, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.

As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Colorado River protection bill locks in water rights, forecloses future federal streamflow safeguard” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s1787 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.