Organ transplant programs can't reject disabled patients outright
S. 1782 — Charlotte Woodward Organ Transplant Discrimination Prevention Act · Filed by Ashley Moody (R-FL) · 22 cosponsors · Introduced May 15, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill prohibits hospitals and organ transplant programs that receive federal funding from denying transplants or related services to people based on disability. It requires these programs to make reasonable accommodations (like sign language interpreters or modified policies) unless doing so would fundamentally alter the program, and allows doctors to consider disability only after an individualized assessment and only if the person cannot meet health requirements even with accommodations. The bill creates a reporting requirement and expedited complaint process at HHS.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a straightforward civil-rights prohibition on disability-based discrimination in organ transplant allocation, modeled on existing ADA and Section 504 frameworks. It is not a market intervention, subsidy, or deregulation—it is a rights-protection statute.
What the text implies
- The bill's exception for 'individualized assessment' and 'professional judgment' preserves significant discretion for transplant centers; the boundary between permissible medical judgment and impermissible disability discrimination may generate litigation and require regulatory clarification.
- Requirement for 'reasonable modifications' and 'auxiliary aids and services' may increase operational costs for transplant programs, potentially shifting expenses to hospital budgets or insurance pools rather than to individual patients.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
People with disabilities gain explicit legal protection against blanket exclusion from life-saving transplants based solely on disability status, while the bill preserves medical judgment and does not mandate transplants for unqualified candidates. The accommodation requirement and individualized assessment standard shift power from categorical exclusion to case-by-case evaluation, benefiting disabled citizens without imposing unreasonable burdens on medical providers.