Federal workers' families lose health coverage for gender care
S. 1774 — Protecting Minors in Federal Health Plans Act · Filed by James Risch (R-ID) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced May 15, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) program to prohibit coverage of gender-affirming medical care—including hormone therapy, puberty blockers, and surgical procedures—for individuals under 18 years old. It carves out exceptions for intersex conditions, treatment of complications from prior medical interventions, life-threatening emergencies, and standard puberty treatments for precocious or delayed puberty. Minors already receiving covered hormone therapy as of the bill's enactment may continue for up to one year on a physician-supervised reduction schedule.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a categorical exclusion from federal employee health insurance for a specific class of medical treatment for minors. It is not a safety measure, transparency requirement, or fraud prevention—it is a coverage denial.
What the text implies
- The bill applies only to FEHB (federal employee plans), not to Medicare, Medicaid, or private insurance, creating a two-tier system where federal workers' families have fewer treatment options than other Americans—potentially incentivizing federal employees to seek private coverage or out-of-pocket care.
- The one-year wind-down provision for minors already in treatment may force abrupt cessation of ongoing medical care, creating medical and psychological discontinuity for vulnerable patients mid-treatment.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who it affects
The bill restricts access to a category of medical care for a vulnerable population (minors) by removing it from federal employee health plans, reducing treatment options available to federal workers' families and potentially setting a precedent for other public and private insurers. The carve-outs for intersex and emergency conditions are narrow and do not offset the broad exclusion.