Federal agencies must show permit applicants what's actually happening
S. 1735 — Permitting Transparency and Accountability Act · Filed by Rick Scott (R-FL) · 6 cosponsors · Introduced May 13, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires federal agencies that issue permits to post a webpage showing the status of each permit application, including what stage it's in, how long each stage takes, who is reviewing it, and when a decision is expected. Citizens and businesses applying for permits will be able to track their applications in real time instead of being left in the dark.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole operative mechanism is a transparency requirement—agencies must publish permit-application status information. It does not change permitting standards, timelines, or approval criteria; it only makes existing processes visible to the public.
What the text implies
- Agencies may face pressure to accelerate permit decisions once timelines become public and reviewers are named; this could improve efficiency but may also incentivize rubber-stamping if resources are insufficient.
- Contact information for individual reviewers may expose staff to external pressure, harassment, or lobbying; agencies may need to establish protocols to protect reviewer privacy while maintaining accountability.
- The bill does not mandate staffing or funding increases; agencies may struggle to maintain current timelines while adding web-publishing obligations, potentially creating a compliance burden without improving actual decision speed.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Permit applicants—homeowners, small businesses, developers, environmental groups—gain transparency into a process that directly affects their ability to build, operate, or challenge projects. Visibility into timelines and reviewer contact information reduces arbitrary delay and creates accountability pressure on agencies.
Named in the bill
Federal agencies (all covered agencies that issue permits), OMB (Office of Management and Budget, likely to issue guidance), GSA (General Services Administration, may provide web infrastructure)
Where it stands
6 cosponsors: 6 Republicans.
- May 13, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- May 13, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs”
- Aug 6, 2026 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the…”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (1,864 characters) on Aug 12, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Federal agencies must show permit applicants what's actually happening” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s1735 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.