QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal teacher wage boost comes with teeth to stop states from cutting their own pay

S. 1697 — RAISE Act of 2025 · Filed by Cory Booker (D-NJ) · 5 cosponsors · Introduced May 8, 2025 · Referred to committee

72%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Teacher Wage Supplement & Enforcement

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a refundable federal tax credit for teachers working in high-poverty schools, worth $1,000 base plus up to $14,000 additional (or $9,000 for early childhood educators without a bachelor's degree), scaled by the school's student poverty ratio. It also expands a teacher expense deduction, appropriates $5.2 billion annually to Title I schools, and reserves 20% of funds above $2.2 billion as grants to school districts that maintain or increase teacher salaries—with explicit guardrails preventing states and employers from using the credit to reduce their own teacher pay commitments.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a refundable tax credit for teachers in high-poverty schools, paired with mandatory appropriations and explicit anti-offset provisions. It is fundamentally a wage-support measure with built-in guardrails against employer/state capture.

What the text implies

  • The supplementation rules (Section 2(d)) require states and school districts to demonstrate that teacher pay allocation methodology ensures schools receive the same state/local funds as if the credit had not been enacted. This creates an ongoing compliance and audit burden on state education agencies and may trigger disputes over baseline funding calculations.
  • The bill ties eligibility to Title I poverty measures and the Child Care and Development Block Grant, meaning the credit's availability and amount depend on federal poverty data collection and definitions—changes to those definitions could alter eligibility retroactively or prospectively.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

public school teachers; early childhood educators; school districts maintaining teacher salaries

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record