Congress ties college funding to severing Chinese research ties
S. 1694 — DHS Restrictions on Confucius Institutes and Chinese Entities of Concern Act · Filed by Rick Scott (R-FL) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced May 8, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill bars U.S. colleges and universities from receiving Department of Homeland Security funding if they maintain relationships (contracts, agreements, donations) with Confucius Institutes or Chinese universities involved in military research, defense work, or support for Chinese government security agencies. Schools must sever these ties within 12 months of the law's enactment to remain eligible for DHS grants.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a straightforward eligibility restriction: DHS funding conditioned on severing ties with specified Chinese entities. It is framed as a national-security measure and operates transparently through a defined exclusion rule.
What the text implies
- May incentivize U.S. universities to terminate legitimate academic partnerships with Chinese institutions unrelated to military work, due to difficulty in verifying compliance with the 'military-civil fusion' definition.
- The definition of 'Chinese entity of concern' is broad and may capture universities with only tangential defense-sector connections, creating compliance uncertainty.
- Could reduce U.S. academic competitiveness in fields where Chinese collaboration is valuable (e.g., climate science, materials research) if institutions choose to exit partnerships rather than risk DHS funding loss.
- DHS funding scope is not specified; if it covers research grants, the impact on STEM programs at major research universities could be significant.
Who it affects
The bill addresses legitimate national-security concerns about foreign military-linked entities operating on U.S. campuses, which may protect academic integrity and security. However, it may also chill legitimate academic exchange, research collaboration, and cultural dialogue, and could disproportionately burden institutions with existing partnerships without clear evidence of actual harm.
Named in the bill
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Confucius Institutes, Chinese universities, U.S. institutions of higher education, Central Military Commission of the Chinese Communist Party, State Administration for Science, Technology, and Industry for the National Defense (China)
Where it stands
3 cosponsors: 3 Republicans.
- May 8, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- May 8, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jun 8, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress ties college funding to severing Chinese research ties” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s1694 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.