QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress moves to block U.S. funding for forced-labor projects abroad

S. 1685 — No Funds for Forced Labor Act · Filed by Rick Scott (R-FL) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced May 8, 2025 · Referred to committee

85%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
5/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Human Rights Accountability Measure

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill directs the U.S. Treasury Secretary to instruct American representatives at international financial institutions (like the World Bank) to oppose loans to projects that use forced labor or are controlled by state entities in Xinjiang, China. It requires these institutions to explain how they vet projects for forced labor risks and report annually to Congress on implementation.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a directive to U.S. Treasury officials to use American voting power at multilateral development banks to block financing for forced-labor projects, with mandatory reporting to Congress. This is a straightforward human rights and anti-slavery enforcement tool.

What the text implies

  • May create friction with U.S. allies and partners who have different labor-vetting standards or geopolitical interests in projects the U.S. opposes, potentially weakening coalition-building on other multilateral issues.
  • Reporting requirements may expose intelligence methods or confidential vetting processes used by international financial institutions, creating tension between transparency and operational security.
  • The bill's focus on Xinjiang state-owned entities may inadvertently incentivize private Chinese companies to participate in projects to avoid the restriction, without necessarily improving labor conditions.
  • Annual reporting for 6 years creates ongoing congressional oversight but may also create political pressure to block projects based on geopolitical rather than labor-rights grounds.

Who it affects

The bill restricts U.S. financial support for projects involving forced labor and human rights abuses, aligning American lending with anti-slavery principles. It increases transparency and accountability by requiring detailed reporting on forced labor vetting, strengthening democratic oversight of how U.S. funds are deployed internationally.

Named in the bill

U.S. Treasury Department, International Financial Institutions, World Bank, International Finance Corporation, Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China, Congressional-Executive Commission on China, International Labour Organization, Senate Committee on Foreign Relations

Where it stands

1 cosponsor: 1 Democrats.

  • May 8, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
  • May 8, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Foreign Relations · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI scored this bill from its title only — the full text has not been read; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Congress moves to block U.S. funding for forced-labor projects abroad” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s1685 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the bill title — full-text pass pending · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.