Congress mandates CBP hiring surge and demands transparency on border operations.
S. 1678 — Securing America's Ports of Entry Act of 2025 · Filed by Gary Peters (D-MI) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced May 8, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires U.S. Customs and Border Protection to hire 1,000 new officers every fiscal year (plus support staff) until staffing matches a workload model, and mandates detailed reports on port infrastructure needs, drug-detection equipment, officer safety gear, and how temporary duty reassignments affect port security. It also requires CBP to report on agreements with ports and to brief employees about staffing changes.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a hiring mandate for federal law-enforcement personnel paired with transparency and reporting requirements designed to ensure congressional oversight of CBP operations and port security.
What the text implies
- Workload Staffing Model is not defined in this bill; its contents and methodology are external, meaning Congress is delegating the actual hiring target to an administrative model that may shift without legislative action.
- Quarterly reporting on temporary duty assignments may reveal patterns of CBP resource concentration on southern border operations at the expense of other ports, creating political pressure for reallocation.
- The 90-day infrastructure report may identify significant capital needs (detection equipment, safety gear) that are not funded by this bill, creating an unfunded mandate for future appropriations.
- Advance notice requirement (10 days) for staffing redeployments may be insufficient for ports to adjust operations, and the 'emergency circumstances' exception is undefined, potentially allowing circumvention.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill increases federal law-enforcement capacity at ports of entry and mandates transparency and accountability mechanisms (quarterly reporting, advance notice of staffing changes, employee briefings) that allow Congress and the public to monitor CBP operations. Citizens benefit from enhanced drug interdiction capability and reduced vulnerability from sudden staffing reductions.
Who stands to gain
- U.S. Customs and Border Protection (federal agency receiving expanded budget authority)
- Defense contractors and equipment manufacturers (potential suppliers of detection and safety equipme
Named in the bill
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Commissioner for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Comptroller General of the United States, Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, Senate Committee on Finance, House Committee on Homeland Security, House Committee on Ways and Means, Workload Staffing Model, Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act of 2015, Homeland Security Act of 2002
Where it stands
3 cosponsors: 2 Republicans, 1 Independents.
- May 8, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- May 8, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 1 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $1,172,100 in lobbying spend. A filing names 54 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Gary Peters, the sponsor, reported $-186,100 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- American Association of Airport Executives — $1,172,100 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 16, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (7,617 characters) on Sep 7, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,398 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 16, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-23.
“Congress mandates CBP hiring surge and demands transparency on border operations.” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s1678 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.