Congress mandates insurance coverage for birth-defect reconstruction
S. 1677 — Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act · Filed by Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) · 54 cosponsors · Introduced May 8, 2025 · Hearing held
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires health insurance plans to cover diagnosis and treatment of congenital anomalies and birth defects affecting the eyes, ears, teeth, mouth, or jaw—including reconstructive surgery, dental work, and follow-up care—at the same cost-sharing level as other medical benefits. Patients with these conditions gain access to previously excluded or limited treatments; insurers must cover these services but can still charge copays and deductibles consistent with other medical care.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a straightforward insurance coverage requirement—it mandates that group and individual health plans cover specified services related to congenital anomalies and birth defects. The title 'Ensuring Lasting Smiles Act' is a thematic reference to the conditions covered (dental/oral), not a misdirection.
What the text implies
- The bill's definition of 'medically necessary' is delegated to the treating physician, which may create variation in coverage interpretation across plans and states, potentially leading to disputes over what qualifies as treatment versus cosmetic enhancement.
- The mandate applies uniformly to group and individual plans but does not address Medicaid or Medicare, leaving coverage gaps for uninsured or publicly insured patients with these conditions.
- Dental and orthodontic services are explicitly carved out from normal plan exclusions when tied to birth defects, which may increase overall plan costs and potentially trigger premium increases for all enrollees.
- The study requirement (due Dec 31, 2027) on network adequacy and out-of-pocket costs suggests Congress anticipates potential access and affordability challenges but does not pre-emptively address them in the bill itself.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Ordinary people with congenital anomalies and birth defects gain access to medically necessary reconstructive and dental care that was previously excluded or severely limited by insurance plans. The bill does not eliminate cost-sharing, but it prevents insurers from imposing discriminatory cost-sharing on these specific conditions and removes categorical exclusions on dental and orthodontic care tied to birth defects.
Who stands to gain
- health insurance issuers (may face increased claims costs)
- reconstructive surgeons and oral surgeons
- orthodontists and prosthodontists
- dental service providers
- medical device manufacturers (implants, prosthetics)
Named in the bill
Public Health Service Act, Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), Internal Revenue Code, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), group health plans, health insurance issuers, treating physicians
Where it stands
54 cosponsors: 36 Democrats, 17 Republicans, 1 Independents.
- May 8, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- May 8, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions”
- Mar 19, 2026 — Hearing held · Congress.gov: “Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
8 lobbying clients named this bill on 10 disclosure filings across 3 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $1,827,179 in lobbying spend. A filing names 14 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 88% of bills with at least one filing.
Tammy Baldwin, the sponsor, reported $195,336 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- American Dental Association — $593,780 on 2 filings
- American Academy of Ophthalmology — $302,068 on 1 filing
- American Academy of Otolaryngology-head and Neck Surgery — $286,331 on 1 filing
- American Speech-language-hearing Association — $280,000 on 1 filing
- American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons — $210,000 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (14,686 characters) on Aug 18, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress mandates insurance coverage for birth-defect reconstruction” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s1677 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.