Congress moves to cap Fed's balance sheet and eliminate emergency lending tool
S. 1648 — Right-size the Federal Reserve Act · Filed by Rick Scott (R-FL) · Introduced May 7, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill caps the total assets of all Federal Reserve banks at no more than 10% of U.S. GDP, effective 10 years after enactment. It requires the Fed to eliminate the Overnight Reserve Repurchase Facility within one year and prohibits creating a similar facility. It also mandates annual reporting to Congress on foreign-owned banks receiving interest payments from the Fed and restores reserve requirements to March 2020 levels. The primary beneficiary is Congress, which gains oversight and constraint over Fed balance-sheet expansion; the primary cost falls on the Federal Reserve's operational flexibility during financial stress.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a statutory cap on Fed assets, elimination of an emergency lending facility, and mandatory reporting to Congress. This is fundamentally a constraint on central-bank independence and balance-sheet size, framed as 'right-sizing' the Fed's role.
What the text implies
- The 10-year phase-in delays the asset cap's effect, but markets may begin pricing in the eventual constraint immediately, potentially affecting long-term Fed credibility and inflation expectations.
- Elimination of the Overnight Reserve Repurchase Facility removes a key tool the Fed used during the 2019 repo crisis and COVID-19 pandemic; absence of this tool in a future crisis could force the Fed to rely on more disruptive emergency measures or leave it unable to respond.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Citizens benefit from increased congressional oversight of the Fed and constraints on unchecked balance-sheet growth, which may reduce moral hazard and inflation risk. However, the 10-year phase-in and elimination of emergency lending facilities may reduce the Fed's ability to respond to future financial crises, potentially harming ordinary people through reduced credit availability or deeper recessions if emergency tools are unavailable.