QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress bans Chinese AI from federal contracts, but leaves consumers unprotected

S. 1638 — Protection Against Foreign Adversarial Artificial Intelligence Act of 2025 · Filed by Bill Cassidy (R-LA) · 3 cosponsors · Introduced May 7, 2025 · Referred to committee

72%
Transparency
Typical bill: 85%
18/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Foreign AI Restriction & National Security…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill prohibits federal contractors from using DeepSeek (a Chinese AI application) to fulfill federal contracts, with a national-security waiver available for specific cases. It also requires the Secretary of Commerce and Defense to report within one year on national-security threats posed by AI platforms from adversarial nations—including analysis of data privacy risks, government censorship, propaganda use, and circumvention of U.S. export controls on computer chips.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core function is a targeted prohibition on use of a specific foreign AI application (DeepSeek) in federal contracting, paired with a mandatory national-security threat assessment. It is not a broad AI regulation but a sector-specific restriction tied to foreign-adversary concerns.

What the text implies

  • The bill names DeepSeek and 'High Flyer' (its parent company) explicitly, creating a precedent for legislation targeting specific foreign companies by name rather than through regulatory frameworks—potentially exposing the bill to challenges about due process and specificity.
  • The waiver mechanism (SecDOC + SecDef consultation) creates discretionary authority with no published criteria, potentially allowing national-security claims to override the prohibition without public visibility or congressional review.
  • The report requirement focuses on threats but does not mandate recommendations for consumer protection or private-sector safeguards, leaving the broader AI ecosystem unaddressed despite acknowledged data-security risks.
  • By restricting only federal contractors, the bill may inadvertently create a two-tier system where government agencies have protected AI access while private companies and citizens remain exposed to the same foreign data-access risks the bill identifies.

Who it affects

The ban on foreign AI use in federal contracts may protect sensitive government data and intellectual property from foreign access, benefiting national security and privacy. However, the bill's scope is narrow (federal contractors only), and the report requirement lacks enforcement mechanisms or public accountability measures. Citizens gain transparency through the mandated report, but no direct protections for private-sector or consumer use of foreign AI platforms.

Who stands to gain

  • U.S. semiconductor and AI infrastructure companies (AMD, NVIDIA, Intel competitors)
  • U.S.-based AI and cloud-computing providers (Microsoft, Google, Amazon Web Services)
  • Cybersecurity and data-protection vendors
  • Defense contractors and federal IT integrators

Named in the bill

DeepSeek, High Flyer, Secretary of Commerce (SecDOC), Secretary of Defense (SecDef), Senate Committee on Armed Services, Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Chinese Communist Party (referenced), Countries of concern (defined by 10 USC 4872)

Where it stands

3 cosponsors: 2 Democrats, 1 Republicans.

  • May 7, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
  • May 7, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation”

Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.

Money around this bill

1 lobbying clients named this bill on 2 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $1,005,758 in lobbying spend. A filing names 133 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.

More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.

Bill Cassidy, the sponsor, reported $1,329,254 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.

  • National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies — $1,005,758 on 2 filings

Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.

How this was measured

Analysis — Quorum's AI read the full bill text on Jun 8, 2026; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.

Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.

Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.

As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.

“Congress bans Chinese AI from federal contracts, but leaves consumers unprotected” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s1638 Report an error

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record

The week in bills

One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.

One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.