QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal maternal health funds exclude abortion providers, redefine child support for unborn children

S. 1630 — MOMS Act · Filed by Katie Britt (R-AL) · 28 cosponsors · Introduced May 6, 2025 · Referred to committee

65%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
45/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
High concernMaternal Health Infrastructure with…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill creates a federal website (pregnancy.gov) to aggregate resources for pregnant women, new mothers, and parents of young children, funded through grants to states. It also establishes a national list of licensed child placement agencies, creates grants for 'pregnancy support centers' (defined to exclude abortion providers), funds telehealth equipment for prenatal/postnatal care in underserved areas, and amends child support law to allow enforcement of support obligations against biological fathers of unborn children, with collection potentially beginning from the month of conception.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is funding maternal health resources and support services, but it is structured around systematic exclusion of abortion-related services and providers from all federal programs and resource lists, making the abortion restriction the operative principle rather than an incidental limitation.

What the text implies

  • The 'prohibited entity' definition extends to any organization that 'refers for' or 'counsels in favor of' abortions, potentially capturing mainstream OB/GYN practices, Planned Parenthood affiliates, and medical schools that teach comprehensive reproductive health, effectively excluding them from federal maternal health networks.
  • Child support enforcement beginning at conception creates a legal relationship between a woman and a biological father before birth, potentially enabling paternity disputes, custody claims, or enforcement actions that could affect a woman's pregnancy decisions and medical autonomy.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

nonprofit pregnancy support centers; child placement agencies (adoption services); telehealth equipment vendors

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record