QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

NSF funds K–12 math overhaul to close STEM skills gap, boost underrepresented groups

S. 1602 — Mathematical and Statistical Modeling Education Act · Filed by Maggie Hassan (D-NH) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced May 5, 2025 · Reported out

92%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
8/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
STEM Education Research Funding

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill directs the National Science Foundation to fund research and development projects at universities and nonprofits aimed at improving how mathematics and statistics are taught in K–12 schools, with emphasis on real-world problem-solving, data science, and computational thinking. It authorizes $10 million annually (2026–2030) for educator training, curriculum development, and research on teaching practices, plus $1 million annually for a National Academies study on barriers and best practices in mathematical modeling education.

Why we flagged it

The bill is a straightforward federal research and development authorization focused on modernizing K–12 mathematics and statistics instruction through NSF-funded competitive grants to universities and nonprofits. It contains no deregulation, tax provisions, or industry-specific carve-outs.

What the text implies

  • The bill's emphasis on 'computational tools' and 'data science' may indirectly benefit technology companies whose software is adopted in schools, though no specific vendor is named or favored.
  • The requirement that educators partner with 'practitioners in research and industry' creates potential for corporate influence over curriculum content, though partnerships are voluntary and subject to NSF merit review.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

universities and nonprofit organizations receiving NSF research grants; educational technology and software companies (indirect, if their tools are adopted in funded projec; textbook and curriculum publishers (indirect, if recommendations drive adoption of new materials)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record