QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Federal welfare bill tightens work rules, caps aid at twice poverty line

S. 1567 — Jobs and Opportunity with Benefits and Services (JOBS) for Success Act of 2025 · Filed by Steve Daines (R-MT) · Introduced May 1, 2025 · Referred to committee

45%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
35/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
1
Unrelated riders
No connection to the stated subject
High concernWelfare Work Enforcement & Eligibility…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill overhauls the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program by imposing strict work requirements, performance metrics, and income caps on states. It requires states to track employment outcomes, restricts assistance to families earning less than twice the poverty line, prohibits direct child care spending, and penalizes states that fail to meet federally negotiated work-participation targets. States gain flexibility to transfer up to 50% of TANF funds to workforce or child care programs, but must reserve 25% for core work activities and case management.

Why we flagged it

The bill's core mechanism is a federal mandate to enforce work participation, measure employment outcomes, and restrict assistance to lower-income families. While framed as 'Jobs and Opportunity,' the operative provisions are eligibility caps, work requirements, and state penalties—a reorientation of TANF toward labor-force participation metrics rather than income support.

  • Section 16 ('Welfare for needs not weed') prohibits TANF funds from being used at establishments selling marijuana—substantively unrelated to employment accountability or work requirements.

What the text implies

  • The income cap at twice the poverty line (approximately $2,900/month for a family of three in 2025) may disqualify working families with modest earnings, creating a 'welfare cliff' that discourages employment advancement.
  • Prohibition on direct child care spending forces states to choose between funding child care or other services, potentially reducing access to care that enables parental employment—undermining the bill's stated work-promotion goal.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

workforce development contractors and training providers (expanded WIOA funding pathway); child care providers (if states elect to transfer funds under Section 404); case management and IT vendors (required tracking and reporting infrastructure)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record