QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress fast-tracks deportation for sexual assault convictions, eliminating judicial discretion

S. 1517 — BE GONE Act · Filed by Joni Ernst (R-IA) · 18 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 29, 2025 · Referred to committee

95%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Immigration Enforcement Expansion

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill adds sexual assault and aggravated sexual violence to the list of crimes classified as 'aggravated felonies' under U.S. immigration law. Once classified as an aggravated felony, a non-citizen convicted of such a crime becomes deportable and ineligible for most forms of relief from removal. The bill expedites removal proceedings for non-citizens convicted of these sexual offenses.

Why we flagged it

The bill is a straightforward amendment to immigration law that expands the categories of crimes triggering mandatory deportation. It is not a tax measure, appropriation, or regulatory carve-out — it is a substantive change to the deportability standard for a specific class of offenders.

What the text implies

  • Non-citizens convicted of sexual assault lose access to cancellation of removal, a discretionary form of relief that allows judges to weigh family ties, length of residence, and rehabilitation. The bill eliminates judicial discretion entirely for this category.
  • The bill does not define 'aggravated sexual violence' — that term is not defined in the INA and may be interpreted differently across states and federal courts, creating inconsistent application and potential due-process concerns.

The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.

Who it affects

The bill serves a legitimate public-safety interest by expediting removal of non-citizens convicted of serious sexual crimes, which protects potential victims and reflects community safety priorities. However, the bill may also remove due-process protections and discretionary judicial review for individuals whose convictions may not reflect the severity implied by the label, and it creates a categorical bar that eliminates case-by-case assessment of individual circumstances, family ties, and reh

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record