Federal government to subsidize 28% of state and local infrastructure bond interest
S. 1480 — American Infrastructure Bonds Act of 2025 · Filed by Roger Wicker (R-MS) · 7 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 10, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates a new federal tax credit that pays state and local governments (and other public entities) 28% of the interest they owe on infrastructure bonds, with the Treasury Department sending the payment directly to the bond issuer each time interest is due. The credit applies only to bonds that would normally be tax-exempt under existing law, and issuers must elect to participate. The effect is to reduce the net cost of borrowing for infrastructure projects by having the federal government subsidize roughly one-quarter of the interest expense.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a direct federal subsidy to state and local bond issuers, reducing their borrowing costs by 28% of interest payments. This is a straightforward fiscal transfer designed to incentivize or cheapen public infrastructure borrowing.
What the text implies
- The 28% credit is paid by Treasury regardless of whether the issuer's tax rate would have made the bond tax-exempt attractive anyway—this may subsidize borrowing that would have occurred without federal support.
- The sequestration adjustment (subsection d) ensures payments are protected from budget cuts, creating a quasi-mandatory spending stream that may be difficult to control in future deficit-reduction efforts.
- By making interest includible in gross income (subsection d(1)), the bill eliminates the tax-exemption feature of these bonds for bondholders, shifting the subsidy entirely to the issuer rather than the investor—a structural change that may affect bond market pricing and demand.
- States are permitted to treat the credit as exempt from state income tax (subsection c), creating a potential double subsidy if states also exempt the interest itself, though the bill's language attempts to prevent this.
- The credit applies to any bond that would qualify as tax-exempt under existing law, potentially including bonds for projects with mixed public/private benefit or questionable public purpose, as long as they meet IRC §103 and are not private activity bonds.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill reduces the cost of financing public infrastructure by having the federal government subsidize a portion of interest payments. This lowers the fiscal burden on state and local governments, potentially freeing resources for other public services or reducing pressure for tax increases. Citizens benefit indirectly through more affordable public infrastructure investment, though the benefit is diffuse and depends on how states and localities deploy the savings.
Who stands to gain
- state and local governments
- public authorities and agencies
- municipal bond issuers
- infrastructure project sponsors (public entities)
Named in the bill
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, U.S. Treasury Department, state and local governments, Office of Management and Budget, Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010
Where it stands
7 cosponsors: 5 Democrats, 2 Republicans.
- Apr 10, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Apr 10, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Finance · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
3 lobbying clients named this bill on 5 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Mar 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $40,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 5 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 61% of bills with at least one filing.
Roger Wicker, the sponsor, reported $116,200 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Black Belt Energy Gas District — $40,000 on 2 filings
- City of Jackson — $0 on 1 filing
- City of Thomasville — $0 on 2 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 25, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (4,579 characters) on May 4, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Mar 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 25, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Federal government to subsidize 28% of state and local infrastructure bond interest” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s1480 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.