Fed gets power to stress-test banks for climate collapse
S. 1471 — Climate Change Financial Risk Act of 2025 · Filed by Brian Schatz (D-HI) · 7 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 10, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Federal Reserve to develop climate change risk scenarios and conduct biennial stress tests on large financial institutions ($100B+ in assets) to assess whether they can survive financial losses from climate-related physical risks (flooding, heat, wildfires) and transition risks (stranded fossil fuel assets, policy shifts). It also requires the Fed to survey mid-sized banks ($10B+) on their climate exposure and adaptation plans, with results made public. The bill aims to ensure banks are prepared for climate-driven financial shocks and to make climate risk assessment a standard part of banking supervision.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core function is to integrate climate risk assessment into federal banking supervision and stress testing. It is regulatory in nature, not a tax or spending measure, and serves systemic financial stability rather than narrow industry benefit.
What the text implies
- Banks may face capital requirements or dividend restrictions if climate risk assessments reveal inadequate buffers, potentially reducing shareholder returns and slowing lending to carbon-intensive industries.
- The bill's requirement for climate risk resolution plans may force large financial institutions to divest from or reduce exposure to fossil fuel and climate-vulnerable sectors, accelerating capital reallocation toward renewable energy and climate-resilient businesses.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
renewable energy companies and clean technology firms (via capital reallocation); climate-resilient infrastructure and adaptation service providers; financial institutions with low climate exposure or strong ESG positioning