QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress raises water-funding cap for California river restoration

S. 1413 — A bill to authorize additional funding for the San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement Act. · Filed by Alex Padilla (D-CA) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Apr 10, 2025 · Reported out

95%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
5/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Water Infrastructure Funding Authorization

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill increases federal funding for the San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement Act from $250 million to $750 million in two separate accounts, and raises funding for Friant Division water infrastructure improvements from $50 million to $75 million. The money supports California water management and river restoration projects under an existing 2009 settlement agreement.

Why we flagged it

The bill is a straightforward appropriations authorization amendment that increases spending ceilings for an existing water settlement and infrastructure program. It is routine legislative housekeeping to adjust funding levels for an established multi-year project.

What the text implies

  • The bill authorizes but does not appropriate funds; actual spending requires separate appropriations bills, which may not materialize or may be reduced by budget constraints.
  • The San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement involves complex water allocation among agricultural, municipal, and environmental interests; increased funding may shift the balance of water availability but the bill does not specify how the new funds will be allocated among competing uses.

The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

agricultural water users in San Joaquin Valley; water districts and municipal utilities in California; construction and engineering contractors (if funds are appropriated)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record