QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Crypto exchanges must prove they hold customer funds—or face escalating fines

S. 1405 — PROOF Act · Filed by Thom Tillis (R-NC) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Apr 10, 2025 · Referred to committee

75%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
15/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Consumer Protection & Financial…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill requires digital asset exchanges and custodians to prove they actually hold the customer assets they claim to hold, through monthly independent audits and cryptographic verification. Exchanges must segregate customer funds from their own money, cannot use customer assets to cover their own trades, and face escalating civil penalties (25 cents to 90 cents per user, or 2.5% to 9% of assets under management) if they fail to produce proof of reserves. The bill aims to prevent exchanges from losing or misusing customer crypto holdings, a problem that emerged after major exchange collapses like FTX.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a mandatory proof-of-reserves regime with segregation rules and escalating penalties. It is fundamentally a consumer safeguard against exchange insolvency and asset misappropriation, not a tax, subsidy, or deregulation.

What the text implies

  • The bill's effectiveness depends entirely on the accounting standard that PCAOB and AICPA jointly approve within 18 months (extendable by 180-day periods). If that standard is weak or allows loopholes, the proof-of-reserves requirement becomes performative. The bill does not specify what 'proof' must include, delegating that power to industry-influenced advisory committees.
  • Margin accounts are explicitly carved out from 'covered assets,' meaning customer funds in margin accounts receive no segregation protection. This is a significant gap: customers borrowing on margin have no statutory guarantee their collateral is held separately, only that the exchange follows 'baseline accounting standards.'

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

independent auditing firms and accounting firms (new recurring revenue from monthly attestations); digital custodians (potential increase in business as exchanges seek qualified third-party custody s; compliance software vendors (tools to track and verify reserves)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record