Federal law enforcement gets new tools to prosecute organized retail theft rings
S. 1404 — Combating Organized Retail Crime Act · Filed by Chuck Grassley (R-IA) · 49 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 10, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill creates federal criminal penalties and a new federal coordination center to combat organized retail theft and cargo theft. It amends federal law to allow prosecutors to aggregate multiple thefts across a 12-month period to reach a $5,000 threshold for federal prosecution, adds retail theft offenses to money-laundering statutes, and establishes a Department of Homeland Security-led Organized Retail and Supply Chain Crime Coordination Center to coordinate federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement efforts. The center will share intelligence with retailers and law enforcement, track trends, and sunset after 7 years.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is twofold: (1) expanding federal criminal jurisdiction over retail theft by allowing aggregation of thefts across 12 months and adding retail theft predicate offenses to money-laundering statutes, and (2) establishing a federal coordination center to align law enforcement efforts. Both are law-enforcement tools, not regulatory or market-facing provisions.
What the text implies
- The 12-month aggregation provision may incentivize federal prosecution of lower-level retail theft rings, potentially shifting enforcement resources from other federal crimes and creating new federal caseload.
- Information-sharing provisions between the Center and private retailers (section 305A(b)(2)(D)) create a private-sector intelligence channel; retailers gain access to federal law enforcement data on organized theft threats, which may improve loss prevention but also concentrates retail-sector intelligence in federal hands.
- The 7-year sunset on the Center creates uncertainty about long-term federal coordination; if the Center proves effective, Congress will need to reauthorize it or risk reverting to fragmented state-level enforcement.
- Expansion of money-laundering predicate offenses to include retail theft (sections 2314, 2315) may broaden asset-forfeiture exposure for individuals convicted of organized retail crime, with civil liberties implications if applied to lower-level participants.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill empowers law enforcement to prosecute organized retail crime networks that currently operate across state lines with relative impunity, reducing theft-driven price inflation and workplace violence affecting retail employees and customers. The coordination center and aggregation provisions address a genuine public safety and economic problem documented in the findings (93% increase in larceny incidents, 84% of retailers reporting increased violence).
Who stands to gain
- retail companies (reduced inventory loss and theft-related costs)
- cargo and logistics companies (reduced cargo theft losses)
- law enforcement agencies (new federal funding and coordination resources)
Named in the bill
Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Federal Bureau of Investigation, United States Secret Service, Postal Inspection Service, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Drug Enforcement Administration, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, National Retail Federation, CargoNet
Where it stands
49 cosponsors: 35 Republicans, 13 Democrats, 1 Independents.
- Apr 10, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Apr 10, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
68 lobbying clients named this bill on 98 disclosure filings across 4 quarters, Sep 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $96,568,631 in lobbying spend. A filing names 7 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 99% of bills with at least one filing.
Chuck Grassley, the sponsor, reported $49,167 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle. $1,000 of that came from 1 PAC tied to these lobbying clients.
- Chamber of Commerce of the U.S.A. — $54,660,000 on 3 filings
- Amazon.com Services LLC — $4,360,000 on 1 filing
- National Retail Federation — $3,881,000 on 2 filings
- CVS Health (and Subsidiaries) — $3,570,000 on 1 filing
- Fedex Corporation — $2,930,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 21, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (17,326 characters) on Jun 3, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Sep 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 21, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Federal law enforcement gets new tools to prosecute organized retail theft rings” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s1404 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.