QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

New sanctions power targets illegal fishing—but gives president broad discretion

S. 1369 — Protecting Global Fisheries Act of 2025 · Filed by Tim Kaine (D-VA) · 5 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 9, 2025 · Reported out

72%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
18/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
Environmental Enforcement & Sanctions…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill authorizes the President to impose economic sanctions (asset freezes, visa bans, loan prohibitions, foreign exchange restrictions) against foreign persons and vessels engaged in illegal fishing, unreported fishing, unregulated fishing, or trade in endangered species. It directs the State Department, Commerce Department, and Homeland Security to work internationally to combat these activities, with particular focus on China's fishing practices, and requires annual reporting to Congress on sanctions imposed and global illegal fishing patterns.

Why we flagged it

The bill's operative mechanism is a presidential sanctions regime targeting illegal fishing and endangered species trafficking. While framed as international collaboration, the core function is granting executive authority to impose economic penalties on foreign actors.

What the text implies

  • The bill grants broad presidential discretion to impose sanctions without requiring prior congressional approval or formal findings of fact, relying on executive determination and recommendation by multiple cabinet secretaries.
  • Sanctions apply to any person who 'has ever owned, operated, chartered, or controlled a vessel' during which illegal fishing occurred—a retroactive standard that may capture individuals with minimal involvement or knowledge.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

legitimate fishing industry (reduced competition from illegal operators); marine conservation organizations (enforcement support); US government agencies (expanded enforcement authority)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record