Congress moves to block mass conversion of federal jobs to political appointments
S. 134 — Saving the Civil Service Act · Filed by Tim Kaine (D-VA) · 24 cosponsors · Introduced Jan 16, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill restricts the federal government's ability to convert civil service jobs from competitive (merit-based hiring) to excepted (political appointment) status. It caps conversions at 1% of an agency's workforce per presidential term (minimum 5 employees), requires employee consent before any conversion, blocks transfers into Schedule C (political appointee positions) without Office of Personnel Management approval, and mandates annual reporting to Congress on all conversions and violations. The bill aims to protect career civil servants from being replaced by political appointees.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a direct restriction on executive power to convert merit-based positions to political appointments. It is a structural governance reform, not a market intervention or appropriation.
What the text implies
- The 1% cap per agency per presidential term may create perverse incentives: agencies could front-load conversions early in a term or use the full allowance even when not operationally necessary, simply to preserve the option.
- The bill freezes regulatory standards to September 30, 2020 versions of Schedules A–E and Part 6 of Title 5 CFR. Any regulatory modernization or clarification issued after that date is statutorily overridden, potentially locking in outdated civil service definitions.
The full analysis lists 4 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Ordinary citizens benefit from a merit-based civil service insulated from partisan pressure — it protects job security for career employees, ensures federal services are delivered by qualified professionals rather than political loyalists, and reduces the risk of politicized enforcement of laws. The transparency requirement (annual reporting) strengthens democratic accountability.