Congress subsidizes private grid tech while ratepayers foot the bill
S. 1327 — Advancing GETs Act of 2025 · Filed by Peter Welch (D-VT) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Apr 8, 2025 · Hearing held
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to create a financial incentive program that returns 10–25% of the cost savings from grid-enhancing technologies (hardware or software that improves transmission capacity, efficiency, or reliability) back to the companies or entities that install them, over a 3-year period. The bill also mandates annual reporting on transmission congestion costs and requires the Department of Energy to publish a guide and provide technical assistance for deploying these technologies.
Why we flagged it
The bill's core mechanism is a financial incentive (subsidy) returning 10–25% of savings to private technology developers, paired with a public transparency requirement (congestion reporting and mapping). The subsidy is the operative provision; the transparency measures are supporting infrastructure.
What the text implies
- The 10–25% savings-sharing guarantee may be passed through to ratepayers as higher electricity costs, effectively socializing the cost of private grid-technology investment while privatizing the returns.
- The 4x cost-to-savings threshold (expected savings must be at least 4 times the investment cost) is high enough to exclude marginal or experimental technologies, potentially limiting innovation to proven, low-risk solutions favoring established vendors.
The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
grid-technology manufacturers and software vendors; transmission system operators and utilities installing grid-enhancing technologies; engineering and consulting firms designing and deploying these systems