QuorumCivic. Hidden in plain sight Get the app
Bill intelligence

Congress buried sweeping surveillance and monetary policy reforms under a false burial-marker title

S. 1318 — Fallen Servicemembers Religious Heritage Restoration Act · Filed by Jerry Moran (R-KS) · 20 cosponsors · Introduced Apr 7, 2025 · Passed both chambers

15%
Transparency
Typical bill: 82%
88/100
Hidden-provision risk
Typical bill: 15/100
2
Unrelated riders
No connection to the stated subject
Critical concernMislabeled Omnibus Intelligence & Monetary…

Your members of Congress

Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.

Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.

What it does

This bill is mislabeled. Its title claims to address Jewish servicemembers' burial markers, but the actual text contains two unrelated provisions: (1) a Foreign Intelligence Accountability Act imposing new civil liberties oversight on FBI queries under FISA Section 702, requiring monthly reporting to the Director of National Intelligence and criminal penalties for unauthorized queries; and (2) an Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act prohibiting the Federal Reserve from issuing, testing, or offering central bank digital currencies directly or indirectly to individuals. The bill's stated purpose—correcting religious markers for fallen Jewish servicemembers—does not appear in the legislative text at all.

Why we flagged it

The bill's title advertises a narrow, commemorative purpose (correcting burial markers for Jewish servicemembers), but the operative text is a sweeping omnibus containing two major legislative initiatives: FISA surveillance reform and CBDC prohibition. This is a classic bait-and-switch structure—the title does not match the substance, and the stated purpose is entirely absent from the legislative language.

  • Bill title references American Battle Monuments Commission and Jewish servicemembers' burial markers; operative text contains zero provisions on this topic.
  • Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act (Title II) is substantively unrelated to Foreign Intelligence Accountability Act (Title I); no logical connection between FISA oversight and Federal Reserve digital currency prohibition.

What the text implies

  • The complete absence of any American Battle Monuments Commission language suggests either a drafting error of extraordinary magnitude or deliberate use of a misleading title to obscure the bill's true contents from public scrutiny and floor debate.
  • The FISA provisions impose new criminal penalties (up to 5 years imprisonment) on FBI employees for unauthorized queries, potentially creating chilling effects on legitimate intelligence operations or, conversely, exposing agents to prosecution for technical violations.

The full analysis lists 5 implications of this text.

Who stands to gain

Financial institutions (potential beneficiaries of CBDC prohibition, which preserves traditional ban; Cryptocurrency and private digital asset developers (CBDC prohibition may reduce competition)

Correlative observation from public records — not evidence of coordination or wrongdoing, and not financial advice.
This page is the record as of today. The app tells you when it changes.
Quorum analysis of the full bill text · 119th Congress · public record