Congress moves to privatize airport security, weakening civil-rights protections
S. 1180 — Abolish TSA Act of 2025 · Filed by Mike Lee (R-UT) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Mar 27, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill would abolish the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) within three years and replace it with a privatized system. The Secretary of Homeland Security must submit a reorganization plan within 90 days that transfers airport security screening to private companies, establishes a new FAA Office of Aviation Security Oversight to regulate them, and moves TSA's surface-transportation functions to the Department of Transportation. Congress must approve the plan via a fast-tracked joint resolution with limited debate.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is the transfer of airport security from a federal agency to private contractors. While framed as 'abolition' and 'cost-efficiency,' the core action is privatization—shifting a public security function to profit-seeking firms with lighter regulatory oversight.
What the text implies
- Private screening companies are explicitly exempted from warrantless-search prohibitions that bind federal TSA officers, creating a two-tier constitutional standard at airports depending on whether screening is federal or private.
- The bill mandates 'cost-efficiency' as a primary goal but does not define security performance metrics, creating incentive misalignment: private firms may cut corners on screening quality to reduce labor costs.
- Transition period (3 years) creates operational risk: TSA workforce reduction and morale collapse during handoff may degrade security before private systems are fully operational.
- The FAA Office of Aviation Security Oversight is a new regulatory body with no existing expertise, budget, or enforcement track record; its ability to oversee private contractors is untested and potentially weaker than TSA's current authority.
- Surface-transportation security (rail, pipelines, highways) is transferred to DOT with no detail on funding, staffing, or regulatory model, creating a gap in federal oversight of non-aviation critical infrastructure.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Citizens lose federal employment protections, uniform security standards, and direct government accountability at airports. Private screening companies prioritize cost-efficiency over security, face weaker regulatory constraints (the bill explicitly bars warrantless-search rules for private contractors), and have no obligation to serve unprofitable routes or populations. Security quality becomes variable and profit-driven rather than uniform and public-interest-driven.
Who stands to gain
- private airport security contractors
- security services companies
- firms specializing in aviation security screening
Named in the bill
Transportation Security Administration (TSA), Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT), Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, House Committee on Homeland Security, Comptroller General of the United States, section 44920 of title 49, United States Code
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Republicans.
- Mar 27, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Mar 27, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
5 lobbying clients named this bill on 7 disclosure filings across 2 quarters, Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $6,039,626 in lobbying spend. A filing names 35 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 78% of bills with at least one filing.
Mike Lee, the sponsor, reported $241,000 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Air Transport Association of America, Inc. (d/b/a Airlines for America) — $2,301,100 on 2 filings
- Delta Air Lines Inc — $1,460,000 on 1 filing
- American Association of Airport Executives — $1,172,100 on 1 filing
- American Fed of Government Employees AFL-CIO — $840,426 on 2 filings
- Air Line Pilots Association — $266,000 on 1 filing
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 20, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (11,014 characters) on Sep 28, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Dec 2025 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 20, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress moves to privatize airport security, weakening civil-rights protections” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s1180 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.