Congress expands rural county funding to smallest towns
S. 1175 — Small County PILT Parity Act · Filed by Steve Daines (R-MT) · 8 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 27, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill amends the Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) program to expand federal payments to smaller counties and municipalities. It lowers the population threshold at which counties become eligible for PILT payments from 5,000 residents to 1,000 residents, and replaces the existing payment formula with a new tiered schedule that provides per-capita payments ranging from $325.74 (for counties with 1,000 people) down to $95.55 (for counties with 50,000 people). The effect is to bring smaller, rural counties into the PILT program and adjust payment rates across all eligible jurisdictions.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole operative mechanism is to expand federal PILT payments to smaller counties by lowering the population threshold and adjusting the payment formula. This is a straightforward appropriations/revenue-distribution measure benefiting rural local governments.
What the text implies
- The new per-capita payment schedule creates a declining marginal benefit as population increases (from $325.74 per capita at 1,000 residents to $95.55 at 50,000), which may incentivize counties to remain small or discourage consolidation.
- Counties previously ineligible (1,000–4,999 residents) will now compete for PILT funds, potentially affecting the per-capita allocation available to larger eligible counties if total appropriations remain fixed.
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who stands to gain
rural counties and municipalities with 1,000–50,000 residents; local governments in low-population areas