Congress demands annual audit of Chinese trade subsidies threatening U.S. jobs
S. 1165 — Strengthen American Competitiveness Against Harmful Subsidies Act of 2025 · Filed by Maggie Hassan (D-NH) · 1 cosponsor · Introduced Mar 27, 2025 · Referred to committee
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the U.S. Trade Representative to monitor Chinese government industrial subsidies and report annually to Congress on which subsidies pose risks to U.S. employment, manufacturing, and critical industries. The USTR must coordinate with multiple federal agencies (State, Commerce, Agriculture, Labor, Energy, Transportation, SBA, and others) and recommend legislative or administrative actions to counter those subsidies.
Why we flagged it
The bill's operative mechanism is a mandatory monitoring and reporting requirement—a transparency and intelligence-gathering tool. It does not impose tariffs, subsidies, or direct trade restrictions itself; it creates the informational foundation for future policy decisions.
What the text implies
- The bill defines 'strategically critical industries' and 'strategically critical goods' by reference to national security and economic security, but does not enumerate them—giving the USTR and coordinating agencies significant discretion in what counts as 'critical' and therefore what subsidies get flagged as risks.
- Annual reporting may create political pressure to recommend escalating trade actions (tariffs, countervailing duties, WTO complaints) even when subsidy evidence is ambiguous, potentially ratcheting trade tensions.
- The bill coordinates across 10+ federal agencies but does not establish a formal interagency process, funding mechanism, or dispute-resolution procedure—implementation may be uneven or subject to bureaucratic turf battles.
- By focusing exclusively on Chinese subsidies, the bill does not address subsidies by other trading partners (EU, Japan, South Korea, India) that may pose similar risks to U.S. industries, potentially creating an asymmetric trade-policy focus.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
The bill creates a transparency and accountability mechanism—regular monitoring and public reporting on a foreign government's trade practices that may harm U.S. workers and industries. Citizens gain visibility into trade threats and Congress gains structured information to inform policy responses. No direct restrictions on citizen rights or remedies are imposed.
Who stands to gain
- U.S. manufacturing sectors (steel, semiconductors, rare earths, advanced materials, defense-industri
- U.S. agricultural exporters (via Foreign Agricultural Service coordination)
- Small businesses competing with Chinese-subsidized imports (via SBA coordination)
Named in the bill
U.S. Trade Representative (USTR), Department of State (Bureau of Economics and Business Affairs), Department of Commerce (International Trade Administration, U.S. and Foreign Commercial Service, Bur, Department of Agriculture (Foreign Agricultural Service), Small Business Administration (SBA), Department of Labor, Department of Transportation, Department of Energy, U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), Senate Committee on Finance, House Committee on Ways and Means, Government of the People's Republic of China — and 2 more
Where it stands
1 cosponsor: 1 Republicans.
- Mar 27, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Mar 27, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on Finance · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
Money around this bill
1 lobbying clients named this bill on 3 disclosure filings across 1 quarter, Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. Those filings disclosed $874,000 in lobbying spend. A filing names 13 bills on average, so that figure is what each filing reported, not a share belonging to this bill.
More lobbying clients named this bill than 0% of bills with at least one filing.
Maggie Hassan, the sponsor, reported $608,285 in PAC receipts in the 2026 cycle.
- Tobacco-free Kids Action Fund — $874,000 on 3 filings
Lobbying Disclosure Act filings through Jul 21, 2026. A filing shows who paid to lobby on a bill it names, not what changed.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (3,981 characters) on Aug 20, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
Money — Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act filings whose specific-issue field names this bill for quarters ending Jun 2026 to Jun 2026. A filing's amount is reported whole beside the median number of bills a filing names; it is never divided across them. PAC receipts are FEC-reported contributions to the sponsor's candidate committee in the 2026 cycle.
As of — lobbying records through Jul 21, 2026 · page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Congress demands annual audit of Chinese trade subsidies threatening U.S. jobs” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s1165 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.