Supreme Court must open its doors to cameras—unless justices vote otherwise
S. 1146 — Cameras in the Courtroom Act · Filed by Richard Durbin (D-IL) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 26, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Supreme Court to televise all open sessions unless a majority of justices votes that cameras would violate a party's due process rights in a specific case. It amends federal law to create a presumption of public access to Court proceedings via television, with a narrow exception for due-process concerns.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole operative mechanism is a direct mandate requiring televised access to Supreme Court proceedings. It is a straightforward transparency measure with a narrow, justified exception.
What the text implies
- Justices may face increased public scrutiny and pressure during oral arguments and bench conferences, potentially affecting deliberative candor.
- Media coverage of proceedings may shift public understanding of constitutional law, concentrating attention on visually compelling cases over technically important ones.
The full analysis lists 3 implications of this text.
Who it affects
Citizens gain direct access to Supreme Court proceedings, strengthening democratic transparency and accountability of the judiciary. The due-process exception preserves legitimate protections for parties while maintaining a strong presumption of public access.