Supreme Court must open its doors to cameras—unless justices vote otherwise
S. 1146 — Cameras in the Courtroom Act · Filed by Richard Durbin (D-IL) · 4 cosponsors · Introduced Mar 26, 2025 · Reported out
Your members of Congress
Enter a ZIP to see where your representative and both senators stood on this bill.
Looked up on this device — your ZIP is never stored on our servers.
What it does
This bill requires the Supreme Court to televise all open sessions unless a majority of justices votes that cameras would violate a party's due process rights in a specific case. It amends federal law to create a presumption of public access to Court proceedings via television, with a narrow exception for due-process concerns.
Why we flagged it
The bill's sole operative mechanism is a direct mandate requiring televised access to Supreme Court proceedings. It is a straightforward transparency measure with a narrow, justified exception.
What the text implies
- Justices may face increased public scrutiny and pressure during oral arguments and bench conferences, potentially affecting deliberative candor.
- Media coverage of proceedings may shift public understanding of constitutional law, concentrating attention on visually compelling cases over technically important ones.
- The due-process exception creates a case-by-case veto power for the Court majority, which could be used strategically to shield controversial cases from live broadcast.
Section numbers refer to the bill text the analysis read — linked under Primary records below.
Who it affects
Citizens gain direct access to Supreme Court proceedings, strengthening democratic transparency and accountability of the judiciary. The due-process exception preserves legitimate protections for parties while maintaining a strong presumption of public access.
Named in the bill
Supreme Court of the United States, Title 28 United States Code, Chapter 45 (Supreme Court Procedure)
Where it stands
4 cosponsors: 3 Democrats, 1 Republicans.
- Mar 26, 2025 — Introduced · Congress.gov: “Introduced in Senate”
- Mar 26, 2025 — Referred to Senate Committee on the Judiciary · Congress.gov: “Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S1874)”
- Jun 18, 2026 — Reported out of committee · Congress.gov: “Committee on the Judiciary. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably”
Dates and quoted wording are Congress.gov's action record; the timeline shows status changes, not every procedural step.
How this was measured
Analysis — Quorum's AI read the bill text published by Congress.gov (777 characters) on Jul 25, 2026. Section numbers in the findings refer to that text, linked below; transparency and hidden-provision scores are compared against the median of 16,222 analysed bills.
Status and sponsors — Congress.gov's bill record — actions, committee referrals and cosponsors — loaded nightly. The timeline shows status changes, not every procedural action.
As of — page rendered 2026-10-20.
“Supreme Court must open its doors to cameras—unless justices vote otherwise” QuorumCivic. https://share.quorumcivic.app/bill/119/s1146 Report an error
The week in bills
One email, Sunday: what Congress passed, what it changed, and who paid.
One link arrives to confirm the address. It is used for this email and nothing else, and every issue carries an unsubscribe link.